Prognostic value of microvolt T wave alternans and
risk stratification of dilated cardiomiopathy |
Authors: |
Topic(s): |
Citation: |
Introduction: Many patients (pts) included in MADIT-II, MUST and
SCD-HeFT studies, likely to undergo automatic Implantable Cardioverter
Defibrillator (ICD) implant in primary prevention of Sudden Death (SD), will
actually never experience hazardous ventricular arrhythmias. Microvolt T Wave
Alternans (MTWA) is a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool used in risk
stratification of pts with cardiomyopathy and poor venticular function (DCM)
approved by US FDA and by ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines (JACC 2006; 48:
247-346) in management of pts with ventricular arrhythmias and prevention of
SD (Class IIa - level of evidence A). Aim of the study: To define clinical and prognostic value of MTWA in
pts of our Department with DCM indicated for ICD implant in primary
prevention and to compare our results with other studies using MTWA in
similar populations of pts. Methods: 152 consecutive pts underwent MTWA; mean EF was 31±8%. Median Follow
Up (FU) 456 days; mean age 65±9 years, 122 males (80%), BMI 27±4; previous MI
in 26%; Hypertension in 81 pts (53%) and Diabetes in 31 pts (20%). Class NYHA
II-III was present in 85%. During FU we considered all-cause mortality, and
documentation of hazardous ventricular arrhythmias (sustained VT; VF). Results: MTWA was normal in 41 pts (27%), abnormal in 111 pts (73% - 59%
positive and 14% indeterminate). The average onset, in positive tests, was
95±9 bpm. 75/111 (68%) pts with abnormal TWA and 7/41 (17%) pts with normal
TWA had successful ICD implant. During FU period 6 deaths occurred in pts
with abnormal MTWA vs no death in pts with normal MTWA; there were also 21
pts with hazardous ventricular arrhythmias among those with abnormal MTWA and
only 1 in pts with normal MTWA. The combined end-point "death +
hazardous ventricular arrhythmias" was significantly higher (p=0.01) in
pts with abnormal MTWA. Test sensitivity in risk stratification was 95% (21
pts/22) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 98% (40pts/41); on the
contrary specificity was 31% (40 pts/130) and Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
was 19% (21pts/111). Conclusions: Our analysis confirms that MTWA may help to identify a lower risk
group in pts with DCM, like most important studies that quote NPV of this
test higher than 90%. MTWA is a non-invasive, low expensive test that appears
to be a promising technique to separate high-risk pts from low-risk pts. This
could be, when assessed by further larger studies, a useful tool to reduce
the number of pts to threat with ICD implant in order to optimize correct
utilization of healthcare resources. |