Prognostic Value of Microvolt T Wave Alternans in Patients With Moderate Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Results From the MASTER II Trial

Presentation Start/End Time:

Monday, Mar 31, 2008, 10:00 AM -11:00 AM

Topic:

Clinical Electrophysiology--Ventricular Arrhythmias

Author Block:

Theodore Chow, Dean J. Kereiakes, John Onufer, Alan Woelfel, Sinan Gursoy, Brett J. Peterson, Mark L. Brown, Wenji Pu, David G. Benditt, on behalf of the MASTER Investigators, Lindner Center at The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH

Keywords:

Ventricular arrhythmia,Defibrillation, ventricular,Risk prediction

Background: Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) has been proposed as a risk stratifier for life threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmic events (LTVTE), particularly in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 30%. However, relatively little data exist on the prognostic ability of MTWA in patients with moderate ischemic left ventricular dysfunction (ILVD) (i.e. LVEF 31-40%).
Methods: MASTER II is a prospective registry conducted at 50 US centers studying primarily community-based post-infarction patients with LVEF 31-40%. Baseline MTWA tests were classified according to standard criteria by a blinded expert reader, with repeat testing of indeterminate tests. According to the study protocol, only patients with a positive or negative MTWA test were included in analysis. Patient treatment, including ICD implant and programming, was left to physician discretion. Clinical and ICD events were classified by a physician committee blinded to patient characteristics. The primary outcome was LTVTE, defined as sustained spontaneous VT/VF, sudden cardiac death, or appropriate ICD discharge. Cox proportional hazards analyses were stratified according to whether or not an ICD was implanted.
Results: After exclusion of 45 patients testing indeterminate for MTWA, analyses were conducted on 303 patients (85% males, mean age=64 ± 10, mean LVEF= 36% ± 3%) who were followed for 2.2 ± 0.7 years. The final distribution of MTWA test results was “positive” in 132 (44%), and “negative” in 171 (56%). ICDs were implanted in 48% of patients. During follow-up LTVTEs occurred in 7 MTWA positive and 4 MTWA negative patients with actuarial event rates being 2.3%/yr and 1.0%/yr, respectively (p=0.25). A positive MTWA test was not associated with increased LTVTE (stratified HR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.34-4.39, p=0.76), including after multivariate adjustment (stratified HR=1.20; 95% CI: 0.33-4.31, p=0.79). However, the ability to detect a significant difference may have been affected by the low event rate.
Conclusions: MTWA test result does not significantly discriminate risk of LTVTE in patients with ILVD and LVEF 31-40%. However the incidence of LTVTE among these patients in contemporary community practice is low.

Learning Objective 1:

Understand the limitations of microvolt T-wave alternans in coronary disease