Abstract Title:

Right Ventricular but Not Biventricular Pacing Increases Markers of Ventricular Electrical Vulnerability

Presentation Start:

Wednesday, Mar 10, 2004, 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM

Topic:

ECG/Ambulatory Monitoring Signal Averaging

Author Block:

Gioia Turitto, Seing Houy, Ravi Gupta, Ronald Pedalino, Nabil El-Sherif, SUNY - Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY

Background: Compared to right ventricular (RV) pacing, biventricular (BiV) pacing is believed to result in improved mechanical and electrophysiologic parameters. Tachycardia-dependent T-wave alternans (TWA) is associated with increased dispersion of ventricular repolarization and is considered a strong predictor of malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias.
Methods: We compared the prevalence of TWA in a group of patients (26 males, 6 females, age: 59+15 years, left ventricular ejection fraction: 34+14%, with values <35% in 25 patients) during atrial pacing, atrio-ventricular (AV) pacing from the RV (AV-RV), and AV pacing from both RV and LV (AV-BiV). The study was conducted during electrophysiology evaluation and/or following device implantation. Pacing rate was 110/min and pacing modes were performed in random order for 10 min each. Criteria for positive TWA were voltage >1.9
μV with ratio (k) >3 for >1 min in >1 orthogonal lead and/or >2 precordial leads.
Results: TWA was induced by atrial pacing in 31% of patients, by AV-RV pacing in 81% of patients, and by AV-BiV pacing in 40% of patients. There was a statistically significant increase of all TWA parameters between atrial pacing and AV-RV pacing (p<0.001) and between AV-BiV and AV-RV pacing (p<0.01). However, there was no statistically significant difference between AP and AV-BiV pacing modes.
Conclusions: RV pacing, even for a short duration, is associated with markers of increased ventricular electrical vulnerability, which are significantly ameliorated by BiV pacing.