Abstract Title:

Does a Narrow QRS Identify a Low-Risk Subgroup of Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease? Results of Electrophysiology Testing and T Wave Alternans Testing in a "MADIT-2" Population

Presentation Start:

Wednesday, Mar 10, 2004, 10:30 AM -10:45 AM

Topic:

Clinical Electrophysiology--Ventricular Arrhythmias

Author Block:

Kenneth M. Stein, Sei Iwai, Suneet Mittal, Steven M. Markowitz, Ravi K. Yarlagadda, Bindi K. Shah, Amit B. Guttigoli, Bruce B. Lerman, Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY

Background: Retrospective analysis of the MADIT-2 database has suggested that the population with a narrow QRS complex derives less benefit from ICD implantation than the population with a wide QRS complex. We sought to determine whether the results of EP-testing (EPS) and T wave alternans testing (TWA) in a population with severe left ventricular dysfunction and prior myocardial infarction were consistent with this hypothesis.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated 67 patients (53 men, mean age 68±9 yrs) who were referred for EPS for risk stratification (n=59) or due to a history of syncope or presyncope (n=8). All patients had documented coronary artery disease and a prior myocardial infarction and all had an LVEF ≤ 30% (mean: 25±5%). All pts underwent TWA testing during rapid atrial pacing (550 msec) with the Cambridge Heart CH2000 system or HearTwave system at the time of EPS. TWA was interpreted using standard criteria by two physicians blinded to the results of EPS. The EPS protocol used programmed stimulation at two ventricular sites with up to triple extrastimuli with and without isoproterenol or dobutamine. Positive EPS was defined as the induction of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with up to triple ventricular extrastimuli. A wide QRS was defined as a QRS duration ≥ 120 msec.
Results: Among the 31 patients with a wide QRS, 65% had positive EP studies vs. 67% among the 36 patients with a narrow QRS (p=NS). Among patients with a wide QRS 58% had a positive TWA test vs. 47% with a narrow QRS (p=NS). Excluding patients with indeterminate TWA tests the positivity rates were 72% and 59% respectively (p=NS). In fully 90% of wide QRS patients and 81% of narrow QRS patients at least one of the 2 tests (EPS, TWA) was positive (p=NS).
Conclusion: The likelihood of a positive electrophysiologic study and/or TWA test is remarkably high in a population with ischemic cardiomyopathy and LVEF ≤ 30%, irrespective of whether the baseline QRS is wide or narrow. These data do not support the concept that a narrow QRS identifies a low-risk subpopulation of "MADIT-2"-type patients.